gospel of barnabas造句

• Some Muslim scholars argue that the Gospel of Barnabas has been modified, thus inconsistency is observed.
• Another book using that same title, the Gospel of Barnabas, survives in two post-medieval manuscripts in Italian and Spanish.
• Some researchers consider that the ensuing 14th 16th-century controversies can be found reflected in the text of the Gospel of Barnabas.
• This Latin Diatessaron textual tradition has also been suggested as underlying the enigmatic 16th century Islam-influenced Gospel of Barnabas ( Joosten, 2002 ).
• Some Muslims believe that the book titled the Gospel of Barnabas is a true gospel, but Christian and non-Christian scholars dispute its authenticity.
• The Italian manuscript has 506 pages, of which the Gospel of Barnabas fills pages 43 to 500, written within red frames in an Islamic style.
• Rather than describing the crucifixion of Jesus, Gospel of Barnabas describes him being raised up into heaven It can be likened to the description of Elijah in 2 Kings, Chapter 2.
• Consequently, no orthodox Muslim writer accepts the Gospel of Barnabas as transmitting the authentic " Injil ", and few deny that the known Italian text contains substantial elements of late fabrication.
• In the Gospel of Barnabas, an Islamic book dated to the late 16th century that recounts a life story of Jesus from an Islamic perspective, a list of the twelve apostles is registered.
• The 5th century " Decretum Gelasianum " includes a " Gospel of Barnabas " amongst works condemned as apocryphal; but no certain text or quotation from this work has been identified.
• Here, one version of the Gospel of Barnabas also quotes Jesus as saying that the sacrificed son of Abraham was Ishmael not Isaac, conforming to Islamic belief but disagreeing with Jewish and Christian belief.
• There is only one instance where the Gospel of Barnabas might be understood as " correcting " a known canonical pericope, so as to record a prophecy by Jesus of the ( unnamed ) Messenger of God:
• The apocryphal Gospel of Barnabas, which explicitly mentions Muhammad, has also been identified as an ancient prediction about the Prophet, but is widely seen by Christian scholars as a fabrication from the Early Modern Age.
• Contrary to the canonical Christian Gospels, and in accordance with the Islamic view of Jesus, this later Gospel of Barnabas states that Jesus was not the son of God, but a crucified and mentions Muhammad by name.
• In the Spanish preface, Fra Marino records his wish that the Gospel of Barnabas should be printed, and the only place in Europe where that would have been possible in the late 16th century would have been Istanbul.
• If the " Gospel of Barnabas " is seen as an attempted synthesis of elements from both Christianity and Islam, then 16th-and 17th-century parallels can be suggested in Morisco and anti-Trinitarian writings.
• The Gospel of Barnabas, which is generally agreed to correspond with the one found in the two known manuscripts and is reported to be contained in Morisco manuscript BNM MS 9653 in Madrid, claims that Jesus predicted the advent of Muhammad.
• Viewed from an orthodox Islamic perspective, the Gospel of Barnabas might be considered a Christian work, as its many points of difference from the Qur'an suggest; hence, it too may be expected to have undergone corruption and distortion.
• By omitting this emphasized phrase in quoting this passage, the impression may be given that there is a " Gospel of Barnabas " earlier than the so-called " Decretum Gelasianum ", an agenda for those who would maintain the late Gospel's authenticity.